Tag Archives: MultifamilyInvesting

The Missing Capital Layer Between OZ Construction and Stabilization

by: Adam Horowitz

The Hardest Gap May Come Before Stabilization

Many Opportunity Zone developers focus on raising enough capital to begin construction. That is an important milestone, but it does not always solve the full capital need.

The more difficult challenge may come between construction and stabilization.

A project may have a strong location, a qualified Opportunity Zone structure, senior construction financing, and a clear multifamily development plan. But the developer may still need additional capital before the asset reaches certificate of occupancy, lease-up, permanent financing, or full stabilization.

This is the missing capital layer in many OZ development projects.

That layer does not have to be one single type of capital. Depending on the project, it may include additional equity, structured equity, mezzanine capital, bridge capital, preferred equity, forward sale capital, or another flexible source. The point is not that one structure solves every deal. The point is that senior construction debt and long-term permanent financing often leave a gap in the middle.

For certain projects, pref equity Opportunity Zone capital can be one useful part of that solution.

Construction Financing Does Not Always Solve the Whole Plan

There is a common assumption that once construction financing is in place, the capital stack is complete.

That is not always true.

Senior construction debt may fund a major part of the project, but it may not address every need before stabilization. A developer may still face timing gaps, remaining equity needs, pre-TCO funding requirements, cost overrun pressure, lease-up support, or investor planning issues.

The project may be too advanced to be treated like an early-stage concept, but not yet stabilized enough for traditional permanent capital.

That middle period can be difficult to finance.

The asset is no longer just an idea. Entitlements may be complete. Construction may be underway. The site may have real value. But until the asset has operating income, permanent financing, and stabilized valuation support, many long-term capital sources may still wait on the sidelines.

Why This Matters for Opportunity Zone Developers

Opportunity Zone projects have more complexity than a typical development deal.

The capital structure may need to account for Qualified Opportunity Fund requirements, investor timing, tax-sensitive ownership decisions, and the long-term hold plan after stabilization.

Developers also need to think about who stays in the deal after completion, who exits, how non-OZ investors are treated, whether OZ investors remain in the structure, and whether the developer continues as an owner or partner.

That means stabilization is not only a real estate milestone. It is also a capital structure milestone.

For Opportunity Zone developers, the question is not only how to finish construction. The question is how to move from construction risk to stabilized ownership without losing flexibility.

Where Preferred Equity Can Fit

Preferred equity should not be treated as the only possible missing capital layer. It is one structure that may fit certain projects depending on the senior debt, equity already raised, timeline, cost of capital, and long-term ownership plan.

In an Opportunity Zone development, preferred equity may help fill part of the gap between senior construction debt and stabilized ownership capital. It can sit behind senior debt while supporting the project’s path toward completion, lease-up, permanent financing, or a future ownership transition.

Pref equity Opportunity Zone capital may help a qualified developer start construction sooner, reduce pressure on the remaining equity raise, support pre-TCO capital needs, or create more certainty around the stabilization event.

It may also work alongside other structures, including a forward sale, investor buyout, developer exit, or continued developer partnership.

The value is not that preferred equity solves every issue. The value is that it can be placed at a point in the timeline where the project has real momentum, but still needs flexible capital before it reaches stabilized ownership.

This Is Not Just Rescue Capital

The missing capital layer is not always about distress.

In many cases, the developer may have a strong project, a credible plan, and a qualified Opportunity Zone location. The issue may be timing. Capital may be needed before all equity is raised, before permanent financing is available, or before the asset has reached the income profile needed for long-term capital.

The goal is not to rescue a weak deal. The goal is to help a strong project move through one of the most difficult parts of the development timeline.

That is why the structure matters.

The right capital partner can give the developer more certainty before stabilization, while still allowing the final ownership structure to be determined when the asset is complete, leased, and valued.

What Capital Providers Will Want to See

Flexible capital is not available for every project.

Capital providers will still underwrite the fundamentals. They will want to understand the location, unit count, development budget, construction timeline, senior financing, equity raised to date, lease-up assumptions, permanent financing strategy, sponsor track record, and Opportunity Zone compliance plan.

They will also want to know what happens at stabilization.

Is there a forward sale? Does the developer stay in? Do certain investors exit? Is the final value based on stabilized fair market value? Is there a clear path to agency financing?

The stronger the project and the clearer the structure, the easier it is for capital providers to evaluate the opportunity.

How Lever Can Help

Lever Capital Partners helps OZ developers evaluate the capital layer between construction and stabilization.

That includes reviewing the construction timeline, senior debt, equity gap, pre-TCO needs, stabilization plan, permanent financing path, and potential forward sale structure.

Lever can help developers compare available capital options, including preferred equity when it fits the project, and connect with capital sources that understand Opportunity Zone development and the transition from construction to stabilized ownership.

For developers, the goal is not just to find more capital. The goal is to place the right capital layer at the right point in the project timeline.

The Bottom Line

Opportunity Zone developers may have a strong project and a clear long-term plan, but still face a difficult capital gap between construction and stabilization.

Senior debt may fund the build. Permanent financing may support the stabilized asset. But the bridge between those two points can still require a flexible capital solution.

That solution is not always preferred equity. It can take different forms depending on the project. But for some OZ developments, pref equity Opportunity Zone capital may be one useful way to help move the project from construction risk to stabilized ownership.

Why Opportunity Zone Multifamily Owners Are Using Preferred Equity to Pay Down Debt

by: Adam Horowitz

Debt Paydown Has Become a Capital Strategy

For many Opportunity Zone multifamily owners, the issue is not whether the asset has value.

The issue is whether the current debt load still works.

A property may be stabilized, occupied, and generating income, but the existing loan may be too large, too expensive, or too difficult to refinance under today’s lending standards. In that situation, the sponsor may not need more debt. The sponsor may need capital that helps reduce debt pressure.

That is why preferred equity Opportunity Zone capital is becoming relevant for some existing multifamily assets.

In this context, preferred equity is not being used to push leverage higher. It is being used to pay down debt, improve the capital structure, and give the asset more room to move into its next phase.

Preferred Equity Is Not Always About Adding Leverage

Preferred equity is often thought of as a way to fill a gap or increase total capitalization. But for existing Opportunity Zone multifamily assets, the use case can be different.

Some sponsors are using preferred equity to reduce the senior loan balance.

That may sound counterintuitive, but it can make sense when the existing debt is creating pressure. A refinance may not provide enough proceeds. A lender may require a lower loan balance. The asset may need a cleaner capital stack before it can secure more stable long-term financing.

In that case, Opportunity Zone preferred equity can become debt paydown capital.

The goal is not to add unnecessary risk. The goal is to create a more durable structure.

The Loan May No Longer Fit the Asset

Many Opportunity Zone multifamily assets were financed under market conditions that have changed.

A loan that made sense during construction, lease-up, or early stabilization may not be the right loan for long-term ownership. Interest rates may be higher. Debt service coverage requirements may be harder to meet. Permanent lenders may be sizing proceeds more conservatively. Refinance proceeds may not fully cover the existing payoff.

The asset may be ready for its next phase, but the debt may still reflect the prior phase.

That mismatch can create real pressure for sponsors. The property may be performing, but the capital stack may be too tight. There may not be enough room for reserves, improvements, or a longer hold strategy.

Debt paydown can help reset that structure.

Why This Matters for Opportunity Zone Owners

Opportunity Zone multifamily ownership is often tied to a longer-term plan.

Sponsors and investors may be focused on preserving the Opportunity Zone structure, maintaining the hold period, and avoiding a poorly timed sale. If the asset is performing, selling early may not be the best outcome. But if the debt is too heavy, holding may also be difficult.

That is why debt paydown can be important.

By reducing leverage, sponsors may be able to create more flexibility, improve refinanceability, and support the long-term ownership plan. The capital decision is not only about today’s loan. It is about whether the asset can remain positioned for the full strategy.

For Opportunity Zone multifamily owners, debt paydown is not just a balance sheet move. It can be part of protecting the long-term investment plan.

Debt Paydown Does Not Always Mean Distress

A sponsor seeking debt paydown capital is not always dealing with a failing asset.

In many cases, the asset may be strong. The issue may be that the market changed between the original financing and today’s refinancing environment.

Debt paydown can be defensive, but it can also be strategic.

It can help reduce maturity risk, improve lender confidence, preserve investor value, and avoid a forced sale. It can also give the sponsor more time to complete improvements, optimize operations, and move toward a more stable permanent financing structure.

For the right asset, preferred equity for Opportunity Zone multifamily can be a way to reduce pressure without forcing a sale or relying only on additional senior debt.

How Lever Can Help

Lever Capital Partners helps Opportunity Zone multifamily owners evaluate whether preferred equity can be used to pay down existing debt and support the next phase of ownership.

That includes reviewing the current loan, estimating refinance capacity, identifying the paydown amount, evaluating preferred equity options, and positioning the asset for capital providers that understand stabilized multifamily and Opportunity Zone structures.

For sponsors, the goal is not just to raise capital. The goal is to use capital in a way that improves the strength and flexibility of the overall structure.

Lever can help sponsors prepare the capital story, compare financing options, and connect with aligned preferred equity Opportunity Zone capital sources.

The Bottom Line

For Opportunity Zone multifamily owners, preferred equity may be useful when the asset is strong but the debt is creating pressure.

By using preferred equity to pay down existing debt, sponsors may be able to reduce leverage, improve refinanceability, avoid a forced sale, and support a longer-term ownership plan.

In today’s market, the right preferred equity capital may not be about adding more risk. It may be about giving an existing Opportunity Zone multifamily asset the room it needs to move forward.

When Existing OZ Multifamily Assets Need More Than a Refinance

by: Adam Horowitz

A Refinance Is Not Always Enough

For many Opportunity Zone multifamily owners, stabilization creates a natural next step: refinance the asset, pay off the existing debt, and move into a longer-term ownership plan.

But in today’s market, that next step is not always simple.

An asset may be occupied, income-producing, and performing well, but the refinance may still fall short. The new loan may not generate enough proceeds to fully pay off existing debt. It may not leave room for capital improvements. It may not create the flexibility needed to support a long-term hold.

That is the issue facing some existing OZ multifamily assets today.

The question is not always whether the property can refinance. The better question is whether the refinance is enough.

Stabilized Does Not Mean Refinance-Ready

Stabilization reduces risk, but it does not guarantee a clean refinance.

A lender may still size the loan conservatively based on current income, debt service coverage, appraised value, market conditions, and interest rate assumptions. Even if the property is performing, the lender may not offer enough proceeds to solve the full capital need.

This can be frustrating for sponsors because the asset may have done what it was supposed to do. Construction is complete. Lease-up is in place. The property has operating history. But the capital markets may have changed since the original financing was put in place.

Higher rates, tighter underwriting, and lower leverage can make the new loan smaller than expected.

In that situation, the asset may be stable, but the capital stack may still be under pressure.

The Debt Market May Not Match the Sponsor’s Need

A refinance usually has to solve several problems at once.

The sponsor may need to retire existing debt, reduce financing costs, extend the hold period, fund remaining improvements, build reserves, and preserve the Opportunity Zone ownership strategy.

But the lender is usually focused on a narrower question: how much senior debt can the asset support today?

That difference matters.

The sponsor may need a broader capital solution than senior debt alone can provide. If the refinance proceeds are not enough, the remaining gap still has to be addressed. The sponsor may need to bring in additional capital, negotiate with the existing lender, restructure the capital stack, or consider a more flexible financing solution.

A refinance problem can quickly become a capital stack problem.

Why OZ Ownership Makes the Decision More Complex

Opportunity Zone multifamily assets are different from ordinary refinance situations because timing and ownership structure matter.

A sponsor may not want to sell too early. Investors may be focused on preserving long-term OZ benefits. The ownership group may want to hold the asset through the required period, but the existing capital stack may not fully support that plan.

That can make the lowest-cost capital solution less important than the best-fit capital solution.

For an OZ asset, the goal is not only to replace one loan with another. The goal is to create a structure that supports the asset, the investors, and the long-term strategy.

If a refinance does not provide enough proceeds, the sponsor needs to evaluate what capital can solve the shortfall without disrupting the broader plan.

When Preferred Equity Becomes Relevant

Preferred equity can become relevant when senior debt does not stretch far enough.

It may help pay down existing debt, reduce leverage pressure, fund capital improvements, support operational needs, or create more flexibility for the sponsor. It can also provide an alternative to selling the asset or raising more dilutive common equity.

This does not mean preferred equity is the right answer for every deal.

The asset still needs to support the cost of the capital. The sponsor still needs a clear use of proceeds. The ownership group still needs a realistic plan for the next phase of the investment.

But when the refinance alone cannot solve the problem, preferred equity can help fill the space between what the lender will provide and what the asset actually needs.

How Lever Can Help

Lever Capital Partners helps sponsors evaluate whether an existing OZ multifamily asset needs more than a refinance.

That includes reviewing the current debt, estimating refinance capacity, identifying the shortfall, evaluating preferred equity or recapitalization options, and positioning the opportunity for capital providers that understand stabilized multifamily and Opportunity Zone structures.

For sponsors, the goal is not just to replace one loan with another. The goal is to build a capital structure that supports the asset’s next phase.

Lever can help sponsors compare options, prepare the capital story, and connect with capital sources aligned with the asset, timeline, and ownership strategy.

The Bottom Line

Existing OZ multifamily assets may still be strong investments, but today’s lending market can limit what a refinance can accomplish.

If senior debt proceeds do not fully address the payoff, improvements, reserves, or long-term ownership plan, sponsors may need a broader capital solution.

For OZ multifamily owners, the question is not only whether the asset can refinance. It is whether the refinance gives the asset enough room to move forward.

Class B Multifamily

Workforce Housing’s Moment: Why Class B Multifamily Is the Smartest Bet in Today’s Market

by: Jiho Kim

Affordable rental housing is facing a supply crisis and for commercial real estate investors paying attention, Class B workforce housing may be the most resilient and underappreciated opportunity in today’s market. While capital keeps chasing Class A luxury products and ground-up development grabs the headlines, the fundamentals quietly stacking up in the workforce housing tier tell a very different story.

Renters Are Stuck and That’s Not Changing Soon

The math on homeownership has simply stopped working for a wide swath of American households. By Q4 2024, the gap between the median monthly mortgage payment and average effective apartment rent had grown to $1,120, a spread that effectively locks millions of would-be buyers in the rental market indefinitely. It gets worse: purchasing a median-priced starter home now requires a minimum recommended income of roughly $86,000, a threshold many younger households aren’t hitting, and saving for a typical down payment takes the median-income household around seven years.

The result is a durable, captive renter base. Class B properties serve “renters by necessity”, low- to middle-income households that need affordable housing near employment centers with few other viable options. This isn’t a cyclical renter profile. It’s structural.

The Supply Picture Is Even Thinner Than It Looks

Multifamily construction is pulling back broadly. Starts totaled 416,000 units in 2025, down from the 30-year record high of 547,000 set in 2022, with fourth-quarter starts falling 36% year over year. But the more telling detail is where new supply is and isn’t going. In Q3 2025, workforce housing represented just 3% of all multifamily development nationally.

The national housing deficit now stands at an estimated 4.03 million homes, a gap analysts say would take seven years to close even under optimistic construction assumptions. The vacancy data tells the same story. In major metros like Los Angeles, Class B and C vacancy sits at around 3.5%, compared to 5.5% for Class A, showing exactly where real demand lives.

Operational Upside Without the Development Risk

This is where experienced sponsors are finding their edge. Class B occupancies are running in the mid-90% range across many markets, often outpacing Class A, while rent growth has been steady and positive, outperforming luxury products in select metros. The play here isn’t speculative. It’s operational.

Acquiring existing Class B assets at reset pricing lets sponsors underwrite real, in-place cash flows rather than lease-up projections that may never materialize. In the current rate environment, where lenders are scrutinizing pro forma assumptions more carefully than ever, that distinction matters a lot.

Institutional capital is already moving. TruAmerica Multifamily recently closed a $708 million fund with roughly $2 billion in purchasing power, targeting up to 30 Class B properties across 25 major U.S. cities, focused on preserving affordability, not pushing assets upmarket. When funds of that scale are making concentrated bets on workforce housing, it’s worth paying attention.

How Lever Capital Partners Can Help

The opportunity is real but structuring it correctly is what separates a good deal from a great one. At Lever Capital Partners, we work across the full capital stack to evaluate workforce housing opportunities and structure financing that reflects the true risk profile of these assets. Whether that means bridge, agency, or mezzanine financing for a value-add play, we help sponsors find the right solution for where the deal actually is not where they hope it will be.

Our established network of lending partners means sponsors aren’t starting from scratch at execution. If you’re looking at workforce housing and want a capital advisor who understands the nuance, reach out to Lever Capital Partners today.

The Capital Gap Facing Stabilized Opportunity Zone Multifamily Assets

The Capital Gap Facing Stabilized Opportunity Zone Multifamily Assets

by: Adam Horowitz

Stabilization Can Reveal a New Problem

For many Opportunity Zone multifamily projects, stabilization is treated as the finish line. Construction is complete, leasing has progressed, and the asset begins to look more like an operating property than a development project.

But stabilization can also reveal a different problem.

The property may be finished, occupied, and generating income, but the capital stack may not match the asset’s next phase. The sponsor may still have construction debt, bridge debt, expensive financing, delayed improvements, or investor obligations that need to be addressed.

This is the capital gap many stabilized Opportunity Zone multifamily assets are facing.

It is not always a question of whether the property works. Often, the question is whether the financing still works.

The Gap Is Not Always Obvious From the Outside

A stabilized asset can look healthy from the outside. Occupancy may be strong. The building may be open. Rents may be coming in. The sponsor may have executed the development plan.

But the balance sheet can tell a more complicated story.

A loan may need to be paid down before the asset can secure better permanent financing. A refinance may produce less capital than expected. A lender may underwrite more conservatively than the sponsor assumed. Capital improvements may still be needed to protect rents or improve operations. Existing investors may need liquidity, but the sponsor may not want to sell.

That is why stabilization does not always mean the deal is fully capitalized.

It only means the asset has moved into a new phase.

Why the Gap Appears After Completion

Many Opportunity Zone projects were planned under assumptions that may have changed by the time the asset stabilized.

A sponsor may have started the project when rates were lower, valuations were stronger, debt proceeds were more available, or exit assumptions were easier to defend. By the time the project is completed and leased, the market may require a different capital structure.

That creates a mismatch between the original plan and the current market.

The existing loan balance may be too high for today’s refinance proceeds. The property may need more operating history before a lender gives full value. The sponsor may need to fund improvements before the asset reaches its full income potential. The ownership group may want to hold long term, but the current capital structure may be too short-term or too expensive.

The asset may have succeeded operationally, but the capital stack may still need to be reset.

Why This Matters More for OZ Assets

Opportunity Zone assets have an added layer of complexity because ownership timing matters.

In a typical multifamily project, a sponsor may choose to sell, refinance, or recapitalize based mainly on market conditions. In an Opportunity Zone project, the decision may also involve tax timing, Qualified Opportunity Fund structures, investor hold periods, and the desire to preserve long-term OZ benefits.

That can make a forced sale less attractive.

If the property is stabilized but the capital stack is under pressure, the sponsor may need a solution that creates liquidity or reduces debt without disrupting the broader OZ strategy.

The wrong capital decision can affect more than the balance sheet. It can affect the long-term ownership plan.

The Real Question Is the Size of the Gap

Before choosing a solution, sponsors need to understand the gap clearly.

That means comparing the current debt balance against realistic refinance proceeds. It means reviewing current NOI, occupancy, valuation, lender requirements, and any remaining capital needs. It also means separating short-term pressure from long-term asset quality.

A sponsor may not need a full recapitalization. They may need a smaller amount of capital to pay down debt, complete improvements, or create enough flexibility to reach a better permanent financing outcome.

The capital gap should be measured before it is solved.

How Lever Can Help

Lever Capital Partners helps sponsors evaluate the capital gap facing stabilized Opportunity Zone multifamily assets.

That can include reviewing the current debt position, estimating refinance capacity, identifying paydown needs, evaluating capital improvement requirements, and determining which capital sources may fit the situation.

For sponsors, the goal is not simply to raise more money. The goal is to understand the exact problem inside the capital stack and match it with the right capital solution.

Lever can help sponsors prepare the capital story, compare available options, and connect with capital providers that understand stabilized multifamily assets and Opportunity Zone structures.

The Bottom Line

A stabilized Opportunity Zone multifamily asset may have moved beyond development risk, but that does not mean the capital structure is complete.

The project may be built. The units may be leased. The income may be real. But if the debt, equity, and long-term ownership strategy do not align, the sponsor may still face a capital gap.

For OZ sponsors, stabilization is not only the end of construction. It is the moment when the capital stack needs to be tested again.

Why Stabilized Opportunity Zone Assets Are Attracting Preferred Equity

by: Adam Horowitz

Stabilization Does Not Always End the Capital Need

For many Opportunity Zone multifamily projects, the development story gets most of the attention. Sponsors focus on site control, entitlement, construction financing, lease-up, and eventually stabilization.

But stabilization does not always mean the capital stack is finished.

A sponsor may complete construction, lease the asset, and create a performing multifamily property, only to find that the balance sheet still needs work. Existing debt may need to be paid down. Capital improvements may still be required. Operations may need additional investment. Ownership may want more flexibility. The sponsor may want to hold the asset longer, but the existing capital structure may not fully support that plan.

That is where preferred equity can become relevant.

For some stabilized Opportunity Zone multifamily assets, the next challenge is not development risk. It is recapitalization.

A Stabilized Asset Can Still Need Capital

There is a common assumption that once an Opportunity Zone asset stabilizes, the hardest part is over. In many ways, that is true. Construction is complete, leasing has been established, and the asset may now have operating income.

But a stabilized property can still have a capital problem.

The original construction or bridge financing may be too expensive. The senior debt may need to be reduced. The asset may need additional capital for improvements or operational optimization. The sponsor may want to avoid a forced sale while still creating liquidity or resetting the capital stack.

In today’s market, this issue is becoming more common. Higher rates, tighter underwriting, and lower refinance proceeds can create pressure even when the property itself is performing.

The asset may be working, but the debt stack may still need to be fixed.

Why Preferred Equity Fits the Post-Stabilization Moment

Preferred equity can be attractive after stabilization because the asset has already moved through some of the riskiest parts of the business plan.

Construction is complete. Lease-up is further along. The property has a clearer valuation. Operating performance is easier to measure. The capital provider is no longer underwriting only a future development plan. They are looking at a real multifamily asset with a more established income profile.

That makes preferred equity a useful option for certain Opportunity Zone owners.

Preferred equity can help pay down existing debt, fund capital improvements, support operational improvements, and create a more flexible capital structure. It can also help sponsors avoid a full sale or a more dilutive common equity recapitalization.

This is especially important for Opportunity Zone assets, where the long-term hold period and tax structure can make ownership decisions more complicated. Sponsors may not want to sell too early. Investors may want to preserve the OZ strategy. The capital solution needs to fit the real estate and the structure.

Debt Paydown Is Becoming a Real Need

Many sponsors are not looking for capital because the asset is distressed. They are looking for capital because the capital stack was created in a different market.

A loan that made sense during development may not be the right long-term structure after stabilization. A refinance may not provide enough proceeds to fully solve the existing debt. A lender may require lower leverage. A sponsor may need to reduce pressure on the asset before moving into the next phase of ownership.

Preferred equity can help address that problem.

Instead of relying only on a larger senior loan, the sponsor can bring in preferred equity to reduce debt, improve the capital structure, and create more breathing room for the asset.

The purpose is not just to add capital. The purpose is to add capital in a position that supports the long-term strategy.

What Sponsors Should Be Prepared to Show

Preferred equity can be flexible, but it is not automatic. Capital providers still need a clear story.

Sponsors should be prepared to explain the current debt balance, stabilized occupancy, net operating income, valuation, use of proceeds, capital improvement plan, existing lender terms, and long-term ownership strategy.

They should also be able to explain why preferred equity is the right fit instead of a traditional refinance, mezzanine debt, common equity, or a sale.

The best candidates are usually assets where the real estate fundamentals are strong, the sponsor has a credible plan, and the preferred equity solves a specific capital need.

How Lever Can Help

Lever Capital Partners helps sponsors evaluate whether preferred equity is the right solution for an existing stabilized Opportunity Zone multifamily asset.

That includes reviewing the capital stack, identifying the debt paydown need, evaluating use of proceeds, and positioning the opportunity for capital providers that understand both stabilized multifamily and Opportunity Zone structures.

For sponsors, the goal is not simply to find capital. The goal is to find capital that fits the asset’s stage, risk profile, ownership goals, and long-term OZ strategy.

Lever can help sponsors determine whether the asset is a fit for preferred equity, prepare the capital story, and connect with aligned capital sources.

The Bottom Line

A stabilized Opportunity Zone multifamily asset may have passed through the riskiest phase of development, but that does not mean the capital stack is complete.

Sponsors may still need capital to pay down debt, fund improvements, create flexibility, or support long-term ownership.

For OZ sponsors, stabilization may not be the end of the story. It may be the moment when preferred equity becomes the right capital solution.

Why Slower Rent Growth Doesn’t Mean the End of Multifamily Investing

by: Adam Horowitz

The U.S. multifamily market, once the golden child of commercial real estate, is entering a new phase in 2025. After years of rapid rent growth, the pace has slowed. National averages show rents flattening or even declining in some overbuilt markets. The culprits are clear, a surge of new supply in key metros, rising affordability pressures for renters, and more cautious household formation in the face of economic uncertainty. For value-add investors, who often rely on rent increases to power returns, this shift requires a recalibration. The opportunity is still there, but success now demands sharper strategy, disciplined underwriting, and creative capital solutions.

Capital markets have also turned more challenging. Debt is more expensive, lenders are cautious, and equity partners are scrutinizing deals with greater intensity. Sponsors pursuing value-add plays are finding capital stacks harder to assemble, especially when projected rent growth is modest. This is precisely where Lever Capital Partners can provide an edge. Lever specializes in helping sponsors structure financing solutions tailored to today’s environment, including senior loans, preferred equity, rescue capital, and bridge debt. With deep relationships across private credit funds, non-bank lenders, and institutional investors, Lever delivers not just capital access but also strategic guidance on structuring deals that align with the current risk climate. Whether it is filling a capital gap on a repositioning deal or securing equity for a complex turnaround, Lever helps sponsors navigate today’s more selective and sophisticated capital landscape.

Despite the slowdown in rent growth, opportunities remain, but they are more market and asset specific than ever. Sunbelt markets like Austin, Phoenix, and Atlanta, which absorbed a flood of new deliveries in recent years, are seeing softening rents. In contrast, Midwest cities and certain urban infill locations with limited new supply are holding up better. For value-add investors, the key is to shift focus from relying purely on rental upside to identifying properties where operational improvements, repositioning, or expense management can drive value. Upgrading amenities, improving tenant retention, and enhancing management efficiency are strategies that can deliver returns even when rents are stable. In today’s environment, true value-add means more than riding market momentum, it requires hands-on execution.

Winning capital and closing deals in 2025 will depend on how well sponsors adapt to these new realities. Lenders and investors are demanding conservative underwriting assumptions. Rent growth projections must be realistic, exit cap rates stress tested, and business plans credible. Sponsors who can demonstrate a clear, operational path to improving net operating income (NOI) rather than simply banking on market appreciation will stand out. Moreover, capital providers are looking for meaningful sponsor equity and a track record of execution, not just financial engineering. Deals must be structured with alignment between sponsor and capital partner, and offers must come with certainty of closing. In this environment, having a vetted network of capital partners and an advisor like Lever Capital can make the difference between winning and losing competitive or distressed bids.

The multifamily sector remains a cornerstone of CRE investment, but the playbook has shifted. For value-add investors, the path to returns is now through disciplined underwriting, selective asset and market targeting, and creative, well-structured capital stacks. Lever Capital Partners stands ready to help sponsors meet this moment, providing not only access to capital but also the strategic structuring expertise required in today’s slower growth market. Those who adjust their strategies to the current landscape and partner with the right capital advisors will find that opportunity still exists, even amid the cooling rents. In fact, for those prepared to adapt, this period may prove to be the foundation for the next cycle of outperformance.

Multifamily Real Estate Is Changing FAST – Here’s How to Profit in 2025!

by: Adam Horowitz

The multifamily real estate sector in 2025 presents both challenges and opportunities. Investors must navigate financial distress, shifting rent trends, and evolving market dynamics. However, those who take a strategic approach can capitalize on emerging opportunities and position themselves for long-term success. This article explores the key factors influencing multifamily investments this year—why to invest, what to consider, where to focus, and when to act.

Partnering for Success in Multifamily Investment

At Lever Capital Partners, we understand the complexities of today’s housing market. As industry leaders in multifamily financing, we provide tailored solutions to help investors, developers, and property owners navigate market fluctuations with confidence. Whether you’re acquiring new properties, developing rental communities, or optimizing your portfolio, our expertise ensures you secure the most competitive financing for long-term growth.

Why Invest in Multifamily in 2025?

The multifamily sector is experiencing significant financial distress, which presents both risks and opportunities. Community banks have reported a 12-year high of $6.1 billion in delinquent loans, while the CMBS multifamily distress rate has climbed to 12.9% as of January 2025. Although acquiring distressed properties at deep discounts is not always straightforward, these conditions indicate a market where well-researched investments can yield strong returns.

Despite short-term volatility, multifamily properties remain a resilient asset class. Rising demand, improving affordability, and strong long-term fundamentals continue to make them attractive to investors.

Key Considerations for Investors

With an increasing supply of multifamily properties hitting the market in 2025, competition is intensifying. This may lead to stagnating rents in some areas, making market selection more critical than ever. Investors must conduct thorough research to identify locations where demand outpaces supply. Additionally, higher interest rates impact borrowing costs and deal structures, making strategic financing essential to maximizing profitability.

Top Markets for Multifamily Investment

Selecting the right markets is crucial for optimizing returns. Some of the most promising cities include:

  • Chicago, IL – Affordable pricing, a diverse economy, and a large population base create long-term stability.
  • San Diego, CA – High rental demand and a limited apartment supply ensure steady market conditions.
  • Columbus, OH – Affordable investment opportunities and ongoing infrastructure improvements enhance its market appeal.
  • Austin, TX – A booming tech economy and rapid population growth continue to drive rental demand.
  • Indianapolis, IN – Strong job growth and an affordable housing market make it an attractive investment choice.
  • Boston, MA – Economic stability is reinforced by key industries in education, healthcare, and technology.
  • Southwest Florida – Rapid population growth fuels sustained rental demand, particularly in key coastal cities.
  • Baltimore, MD – A strategic location and economic diversification create compelling investment opportunities.

When to Invest: Timing the Market for Maximum Returns

Several key indicators suggest that 2025 could be an ideal time for multifamily acquisitions:

  • Continued Demand Despite Increased Supply – While new developments are entering the market, strong demand persists in key areas, supporting rent growth and occupancy rates.
  • Improved Rent Affordability – Rent affordability has increased over the past 18 months, making multifamily housing more accessible to tenants.
  • Stable Employment Rates – With unemployment remaining below 5%, rental income streams are expected to remain steady.
  • Favorable Interest Rate Outlook – The 10-year Treasury yield and federal funds rate are expected to stabilize near 4% by the end of 2026, creating a more predictable financing environment.

Seizing Opportunities in the 2025 Multifamily Market

By staying informed on market conditions, selecting high-growth locations, and strategically timing acquisitions, investors can unlock the full potential of the multifamily sector in 2025.

For those looking to maximize opportunities in this evolving landscape, Lever Capital Partners offers expert guidance and tailored financing solutions to ensure long-term success.

Will Renting Still Be More Favorable Than Buying Across Major Metros by the End of 2025?

by: Kayla Refoua

As housing affordability remains a pressing issue in the U.S., many prospective homeowners are reevaluating whether buying a home is still within reach—or if renting will continue to be the smarter financial choice. With home prices, mortgage rates, and wage growth increasingly out of sync, renting is likely to remain the more viable option for many Americans in major metropolitan areas through the end of 2025.

At Lever Capital Partners, we recognize the challenges and opportunities presented by today’s housing market. As experts in the multifamily sector, we provide tailored financing solutions that empower investors, developers, and property owners to navigate the evolving real estate landscape. Whether you’re acquiring new properties, developing rental communities, or optimizing your investment portfolio, our strategic approach ensures you secure the most competitive financing for long-term success.

Affordability Challenges: Rising Home Prices and Mortgage Rates

The cost of buying a home has climbed beyond what the average household can afford. The median home price now exceeds affordability levels by more than $70,000, making homeownership increasingly difficult. This issue is compounded by:

  • High Mortgage Rates: While interest rates may stabilize or decline in 2025, they are still significantly higher than the ultra-low rates seen in previous years.
  • Housing Supply Shortages: A lack of available homes, particularly starter homes, continues to drive up prices.
  • Rising Construction Costs: Increased material and labor costs make building new homes more expensive, limiting supply expansion.

These factors have led to a significant decline in housing affordability. In 2019, 94% of U.S. counties had homeownership options within reach of median-income households. By 2024, that number had dropped to just 63%. Without a major shift in supply or affordability, many potential buyers will remain priced out of the market.

Renting: A More Practical Choice for Many

While buying a home is often seen as a long-term financial investment, renting continues to offer several advantages in the current economic climate:

  • Lower Upfront Costs: Unlike homeownership, which requires a large down payment and closing costs, renting typically demands a lower financial commitment.
  • Flexibility: Renters have the freedom to relocate without the burden of selling a home, which is especially valuable in uncertain economic times.
  • Less Financial Risk: With rising property taxes, insurance costs, and maintenance expenses, renting can provide more financial predictability.

Even if mortgage rates decline slightly, home prices remain high, making it difficult for many renters to transition into homeownership. As a result, the demand for rental properties—especially in urban centers—will likely remain strong.

How Investors and Lenders Are Responding

The shift toward renting is not going unnoticed by real estate investors and financial institutions:

  • Investors are focusing on multifamily housing as rental demand stays high, particularly in expensive metropolitan areas where homeownership is out of reach for many.
  • Lenders are introducing new mortgage products to attract buyers, anticipating opportunities when affordability improves. However, until housing supply increases, these efforts may have limited impact on shifting renters into homeownership.

By the end of 2025, renting is expected to remain the more favorable option for many individuals, particularly in major metropolitan areas where home prices continue to outpace wage growth. While homeownership will always be a long-term goal for some, economic conditions suggest that renting will still be the more practical and affordable choice for a significant portion of the population.