Tag Archives: StructuredFinance

2026 CRE Refinancing: Why Capital Availability Is No Longer Enough

by: Jack Moskow

Entering 2026, capital has returned to commercial real estate, but it is being deployed much more selectively than in prior cycles. Banks, life insurance companies, agencies, and private credit lenders are still active, yet the market is no longer rewarding broad risk-taking the way it did when rates were near historic lows. Today, lenders are focused on asset quality, sponsorship strength, income durability, and the borrower’s ability to support the capital stack under current underwriting standards. In this environment, the issue is not simply whether liquidity exists. The real question is whether a property’s basis and structure can support a refinance or transaction.

For many owners and developers, this has changed the financing conversation. A few years ago, borrowers could often focus mainly on pricing, proceeds, and execution speed. Now, the conversation is shifting from “What’s the rate?” to “How do we rebuild the capital stack?” Higher borrowing costs, with stabilized assets still seeing rates in roughly the 5.5%–6% range combined with lower valuations and more conservative lender sizing, have made structure just as important as liquidity. Even if capital is available, it may not be available at the leverage level needed to refinance an existing loan or support the original acquisition basis.

Liquidity is available, but it is selective.Stabilized multifamily, industrial, and grocery-anchored retail assets with strong cash flow continue to attract lender interest. Experienced sponsors with proven track records are also better positioned to access capital. However, assets with weaker fundamentals, uncertain leasing, or business plans that depend heavily on future rent growth are facing more scrutiny.

The bigger challenge is the refinancing gap created by loans originated during the low-rate environment. Between 2019 and 2022, many properties were financed at 70–75% loan-to-value, often with interest rates below 4%. As those loans mature, borrowers are now facing a very different lending environment.

Today, lenders are sizing closer to 50–60% loan-to-value placing more weight on debt yield, debt service coverage, and downside protection. As a result, new senior loan proceeds may fall well short of the existing debt balance.

That gap can create serious pressure for owners. A property may still be performing, but if the new senior loan cannot cover the maturing debt, the sponsor must find additional capital. In many cases, senior debt alone is no longer enough. This is where capital stack restructuring becomes essential. Mezzanine debt, preferred equity, joint venture equity, and other structured solutions can help bridge the gap between lender proceeds and the asset’s existing basis.

For owners who still believe in the long-term value of their assets, this type of structuring can be the difference between preserving ownership and being forced to sell at an unfavorable time. Layered capital can provide flexibility, help complete a refinance, and allow sponsors to hold through a difficult part of the cycle. However, these solutions need to be structured carefully. The wrong capital partner or an overly expensive structure can create new problems instead of solving the original one.

Lever Capital Partners helps sponsors navigate this environment by identifying the right financing solution for each asset and situation. In a market where basis increasingly determines liquidity, Lever works with borrowers to assess the gap, evaluate available capital sources, and structure the appropriate mix of senior debt, mezzanine financing, and preferred equity.

By leveraging relationships across banks, life insurance companies, agencies, and private credit lenders, Lever Capital Partners helps clients access capital that fits today’s underwriting standards. The goal is not just to find a loan, but to build a capital stack that can close, support the asset, and preserve long-term value. In 2026, surviving the refinancing cycle will depend less on whether capital exists and more on whether sponsors can structure around today’s reality. 

Industrial and Multifamily Still Dominate, But Here’s Where Real Opportunity Is Hiding in CRE Right Now

by: Adam Horowitz

Industrial and multifamily continue to lead U.S. commercial real estate investment in early 2026. Lenders understand these asset classes, capital is available, and long-term demand drivers remain intact. But as more capital crowds into the same trades, pricing tightens and real opportunity becomes harder to find.

Today, the most compelling opportunities are not disappearing. They are simply hiding in places where capital is more selective, underwriting is more complex, and financing requires a smarter approach. This is where experienced capital advisors like Lever Capital Partners help sponsors navigate complexity, structure the right capital stack, and connect deals with lenders that can actually execute.

Why Industrial and Multifamily Still Attract Capital

Industrial and multifamily remain the default choices for a reason. Both asset classes offer durable demand, relatively predictable cash flow, and deep lender familiarity. Even after several volatile years, lenders are comfortable underwriting these properties, especially in strong markets with experienced sponsors.

That comfort, however, comes with a tradeoff. Competition has increased, leverage has compressed, and investors often face lower upside unless they are buying distressed or operating at scale. For many sponsors, the challenge is no longer finding capital. It is finding returns.

Where Capital Is Quietly Shifting in 2026

As investors look beyond crowded trades, several less obvious sectors are gaining attention.

Last-mile logistics continues to benefit from e-commerce growth and delivery speed expectations. Cold storage is attracting interest as food supply chains and pharmaceutical distribution become more complex. Student housing is seeing renewed demand in supply-constrained university markets, particularly where enrollment remains strong and new construction is limited.

Medical office and life science adjacent assets are also drawing capital, especially properties tied to essential services rather than speculative lab development. Specialized residential strategies, including build-to-rent and workforce housing, are gaining traction as affordability pressures persist across major metros.

These sectors share a common theme. Demand is real, but financing is not straightforward.

The Financing Gap in Non-Traditional Assets

The biggest challenge in these emerging opportunities is not fundamentals. It is capital fit.

Many traditional banks struggle with limited comps, operational complexity, or non-standard lease structures. Debt funds may be interested, but pricing and structure vary widely. Deals often stall because the capital stack does not match the asset’s risk profile, even when the business plan is sound.

In today’s market, strong assets can fail to transact simply because they are paired with the wrong capital source.

What Capital Providers Want to See Now

In 2026, lenders and capital partners are less focused on aggressive projections and more focused on clarity and downside protection.

They want to see a clear operating story, conservative assumptions, and realistic exit planning. Sponsor experience matters, but so does the quality of operating partners. Capital providers are also paying close attention to structure, including reserves, covenants, and how risk is allocated across the stack.

Deals that succeed are designed for lender comfort, not maximum leverage.

How Smart Sponsors Are Getting These Deals Done

Sponsors closing deals in niche sectors are approaching financing strategically. Many are using blended capital stacks, combining senior debt with stretch components or preferred equity. Bridge-to-perm strategies remain common, especially where lease-up or operational improvements are required before stabilization.

Rather than forcing conventional debt onto unconventional assets, these sponsors are using structure to reduce perceived risk and increase execution certainty.

This is where experienced capital advisory becomes critical. Firms like Lever Capital Partners help sponsors translate complex asset stories into financeable transactions by matching each deal with the right mix of lenders, debt funds, and structured capital providers.

Finding Opportunity Where Capital Has Not Fully Arrived

The best CRE opportunities in 2026 are not always obvious. They exist in sectors with real demand but higher financing complexity. Investors who understand this dynamic and design their capital strategy accordingly gain a meaningful edge.

As industrial and multifamily remain crowded, the next wave of opportunity will belong to sponsors who can navigate nuance, structure intelligently, and execute with certainty. In today’s market, capital strategy is no longer a back-office function. It is a competitive advantage.